Download As PDF

The early waggon ways of Britain, built long before steam engines, were not the beginnings of a public transport system. They were something much more specific and much more powerful. They were the physical infrastructure of the coal economy.

From the early 1600s onwards, hundreds of miles of wooden and later iron-railed tracks were laid across Northumberland, Durham and parts of Yorkshire. Their purpose was simple. They moved coal from pitheads to rivers and ports. Almost every early line ran from a colliery to a staith on the Tyne, Wear or Tees, where coal could be tipped straight into ships bound for London and other cities.

This was not a minor trade. By the late seventeenth century, London was burning well over half a million tons of coal each year. Houses, breweries, glassworks, brick kilns, metal workshops and lime burners all depended on it. Without cheap, reliable coal transport, the city would have stalled.

Waggon ways made that possible. Iron-tyred wagons running on wooden rails created far less friction than carts on muddy roads. A single horse could pull a load five or six times heavier than it could on an ordinary track. The cost of moving coal collapsed, and the volume surged. These lines were, in effect, long, thin conveyor belts feeding the capital with energy.

Because of this, the geography of the system was highly specialised. Tracks ran downhill from pits to rivers. They did not link towns to towns. They did not form networks. They were industrial arteries, not public roads.

This brings us to the question of farm produce.

In practice, waggon ways carried almost no agricultural goods. Farmers did not use them to send grain, vegetables, milk or animals to market. There were three reasons.

First, the lines were privately owned by coal companies. They were built, maintained and controlled to serve pits and staithes. They were not open-access routes for the surrounding countryside.

Second, their layout made them useless for farming. They ran from mine to river, often across open moorland or along narrow industrial corridors. Farms lay scattered across fields and lanes, nowhere near the rails.

Third, agriculture already had a transport system that suited it better. Farm produce moved in small, mixed loads to many different markets. That was done by carts, packhorses and later canals. Waggon ways were designed for one thing only, moving huge volumes of a single heavy commodity in one direction.

There were a few later exceptions. Some lines carried stone, lime or iron ore where those lay close to collieries. But these were still extractive, bulk materials, not the outputs of everyday farming.

When steam locomotives appeared in the early nineteenth century, they did not create a new pattern of movement. They inherited an old one. The first railways ran where the waggon ways had already gone, from coalfields to ports and industrial towns. Passenger services and agricultural freight came later, layered onto a system that had been built to serve energy first.

In that sense, Britain’s railways did not grow out of a desire to connect communities. They grew out of the need to feed a distant city with fuel.

The iron roads that eventually carried people and food across the country began life as wooden tracks whose sole purpose was to move black rock to the sea.